Who will Trump publicly insult by August 31?

Barack Obama
$1.1K Volume

Tucker Carlson
$124.74 Volume

Nicolás Maduro
$0.00 Volume

Marjorie Taylor Greene
$0.00 Volume

Megyn Kelly
$1.85 Volume

Jerome Powell
$0.00 Volume

Jimmy Kimmel
$0.00 Volume

Zohran Mamdani
$0.00 Volume

Vladimir Putin
$6.25 Volume

Benjamin Netanyahu
$102.00 Volume

Candace Owens
$5.00 Volume

Kaitlan Collins
$0.00 Volume

Andy Burnham
$801.75 Volume

Norah O'Donnell
$1.0K Volume

Emmanuel Macron
$197.00 Volume

Elon Musk
$522.52 Volume

Friedrich Merz
$522.14 Volume

Alex Jones
$82.00 Volume

Kevin Warsh
$0.00 Volume

Pope Leo XIV
$815.35 Volume

Xi Jinping
$90.00 Volume

Viktor Orbán
$0.00 Volume

Mohammed bin Salman
$0.00 Volume

Pam Bondi
$0.00 Volume

J.D. Vance
$529.33 Volume

Melania Trump
$2.9K Volume
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
- Resolver: official source.
- Deadline: closing date in UTC.
- Disputed outcomes: handled by moderators within 48 hours.


Comments